by Olga
Posted on May 5, 2022 at 9:30 AM
Tags: #teaching&learning #teaching #learning
Teaching comes naturally to me. With practice it gets better. I have been teaching martial
arts for more than a decade and since a couple of years also in academic settings. Yet I
have never asked myself what kind of teacher I am or what educational theories underpin my
teaching. This academic year I have asked this question. During Teaching and Learning module
I have learned a lot as a teacher and an educator. How to make a lesson plan, how to engage
students, how to use and re-use digital tools sucessfully were just some of the skills that
I have obtained. But the hardest part was to form a philosophy statement and to reflect on
what type of teaching style corresponds with me as a teacher. A statement of teaching
philosophy is a cornerstone of reflective practice in teaching and learning and a
requirement of applicants to academic, teaching positions or tenure tracks. However,
according to literature many candidates report that “they have never reflected on what they
do when they teach and that they have never systematically written about their teaching
philosophies and goals” (Schönwetter, 2002). Yet, a personal teaching philosophy is very
important as the process offers an opportunity for developmental reflection (Beaty et al,
2009). A spectrum of approaches and frameworks to generate a comprehensive teaching
philosophy statement can be used. A philosophy statement not only reflects personal beliefs
(self) but also cultures pertinent to a particular subject (discipline) and institutional
context
(organisation) (Schönwetter, 2002).
-
Beatty JE, Leigh JSA, Lund Dean K. (2009). Finding Our Roots: An Exercise For
Creating a
Personal Teaching Philosophy Statement. Journal of Management Education.
33(1):115-130.
doi:10.1177/1052562907310642
-
Schönwetter, D.J., Sokal, L., Friesen, M. & Lynn Taylor K. (2002) Teaching
philosophies
reconsidered:A conceptual model for the development and evaluation of teaching
philosophy
statements, International Journal for Academic Development, 7:1, 83-97,
DOI:10.1080/13601440210156501